Florida Gambling Expansion Alive and Well TODAY in South Marion County With More Phony Horse Events Leveraged for New Card Room

Marion Gaming Management, Central Florida Gaming, Ft. Myers Real Estate Holdings

Check out the “facilities” at Florida’s newest “racetrack”

April 7, 2014–Even as Florida lawmakers declared gambling expansion to be a “dead issue” last week, it ironically expanded TODAY in South Marion County, thanks to Florida regulators issuing a license for more unaccredited horse-related “timed events” enabling the pari-mutuel permitholder of “South Marion Real Estate Holdings” to open a 365-day a year card room at a facility it calls “Oxford Downs” near The Villages—a popular Central Florida retirement community.

“We cannot fathom why Florida seems intent on dismantling its billion-dollar horse racing industry in this manner,” said Kent Stirling, Executive Director of the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association (FHBPA).  “As lawmakers deliberate the importance of funds for the State Budget this week, the loss of horse racing’s substantial economic and job creation engine is something taxpayers can ill afford.”

Because Florida law provides no definition of “horse racing,” regulators have continued to issue licenses to some pari-mutuel permitholders for various contrived activities that skirt the State’s requirement for live horse racing in order to hold cardrooms or slot machines.  The activities dramatically curtail the amount of horses (and thus businesses and employees) that would normally be needed to conduct a legitimate race meeting and corresponding breeding industry.

In a last-ditch effort to educate the Marion County Commission that gambling would be expanding in the heart of Florida’s internationally-acclaimed racehorse breeding industry to the detriment of their own constituents, longstanding Florida Thoroughbred and Quarter Horsemen described “Oxford Downs” as a “mockery” and a “Trojan Horse.”  To read their letters to the editor in today’s Ocala Star-Banner, click here.

National and regional organizations opposing the “South Marion/Oxford Downs” project have included the American Quarter Horse Association, the Jockey’s Guild, FHBPA, Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association, Florida Quarter Horse Breeders’ and Owners’ Association, Florida Thoroughbred Breeders’ and Owners’ Association and Ocala Breeders’ Sales.  Membership in these organizations totals nearly 400,000 horsemen–accredited racehorse owners, trainers, jockeys and breeders worldwide.

After reportedly being physically intimidated with vehicles, and verbally menaced with arrest and other threats, officials from a major Florida horse racing industry group attempting to attend today’s public “South Marion/Oxford Downs” events were ordered to leave.

Below are hyperlinks to the South Marion Real Estate Holdings pari-mutuel license information.

Permitholder Application for Annual License and Operating Day SOUTH MARION REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC Primary 545
PM Operate Lic
Current
06/30/2014
                        Main Address*: PO BOX 650 OXFORD, FL 34484
Permit to Conduct Pari-Mutuel Wagering SOUTH MARION REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC Primary 545
PMW Permit
Current
                        Main Address*: PO BOX 650 OXFORD, FL 34484

Florida’s Thoroughbred, Quarter Horsemen Draw Praise for Unity At Today’s Pari-Mutuel Regulatory Hearing

October 16, 2013–The coalition of horse racing owners, trainers and breeders on hand for today’s Florida Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering rule hearing in Broward County drew praise and recognition from others in attendance who noted the unification among Thoroughbred, Quarter Horse and even some racetrack facility interests in advocating for a cleanup of Florida’s horse racing rules.

Packed into a cramped, hot room for a hearing that was originally scheduled to last the entire day, a “who’s who” of Florida horsemen and statewide representatives from various pari-mutuel factions commented on the proposed rules in an orderly, upbeat manner that belied ongoing tensions among them stemming from the past several years of regulatory havoc.  While many lauded the new rules as a long overdue basis for change, others warned of protracted lawsuits that could erupt from their various nuances.

The hearing concluded in approximately an hour and a half, with most speakers indicating they would provide written copies of their respective suggestions and comments to Division officials later on.

Precipitating today’s hearing, wildly variant interpretations of Florida horse racing law have freely proliferated during the past several years—particularly to the detriment of legitimate, accredited Quarter Horse racing as sanctioned by the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association (FQHRA).

“We definitely think today’s workshop represents a positive forward step by the Division toward ensuring the integrity and stability of Florida horse racing for all breeds–a multi-billion dollar industry with a bright and profitable future as noted by legislative consultants this month during the Florida House and Senate gaming hearings.” said Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association (FHBPA) Executive Director Kent Stirling, whose organization represents some 6,000 Thoroughbred owners and trainers statewide.  “We look forward to working with the Division to lend our national industry knowledge and expertise.”

Today’s Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering regulatory hearing—the first in a series of planned events by the agency—took place in advance of a legislative workshop series being held by the Florida Senate Gaming Committee to receive public input on the recent Spectrum Gaming Study.  The series begins on October 23 in Coconut Creek.

Hyperlinks to the proposed Rules reviewed today are listed below:

61D-2.024 Track General Rules
61D-2.025 Race General Rules
61D-2.026 Jai Alai Game General Rules
61D-2.027 Performances
61D-2.028 Jockey Requirements
61D-2.029 Qualifications of Horses to Start

 

 

 

 

 

Letter from Dr. Stephen D. Fisch, President, Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association to Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation in Response to the “Gretna North Florida Horsemen’s Association” Application for Pari-Mutuel Barrel Racing License

Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association Opposes Gretna North Florida Horsemen's Association Pari-Mutuel Barrel Racing Scheme

“The Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation should deny the Gretna applications and insist on full compliance with all applicable requirements by Gretna and every other Quarter Horse permitholder in Florida.”

Must Read:  National Barrel Horse Association’s Florida Chapter Supports Nearly 40,000 Horsemen In Opposition to Gretna Pari-Mutuel Barrel Racing Scheme

October 6, 2011

Kenneth Lawson, Secretary
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399

Re: Gretna Racing, LLC Applications for Pari-Mutuel and Cardroom Licenses

Dear Mr. Secretary,

I apologize in advance for the length of this letter. I know your time is valuable but this is also a very important issue and the Association would like to express further concern and opposition regarding the additional filings by Gretna Racing, LLC (“Gretna”). These filings are part of Gretna’s continuing attempts at qualifying for licenses to conduct certain “quarter horse” activities and cardroom operations on its premises (“Gretna applications”).

We set forth our many concerns regarding the Gretna applications in a letter to you dated September 27, 2011. On September 30, Gretna filed an amended application with revised information and a request for more racing dates hopefully because they have been able to face the reality that a full schedule of live racing is required and was agreed upon with the passing of the “Lawson amendments”. Perhaps the amendments were filed in order to qualify for inter-track wagering or to meet the requirements of an “eligible facility” for a slot license by racing for 2 consecutive calendar years immediately preceding its application for a slot machine license. Whatever the reasons the amendments were filed, at least one of the reasons was as an attempt to overcome the various problems with its first filing.

Unfortunately, there continue to be a number of deficiencies in the Gretna applications. First, Section 550.01215(1) provides that initial license applications are to be filed between December 15 and January 4. Once filed, a permitholder “shall be entitled to amend their applications through February 28.” Naturally, only timely filed applications may be amended. Just as it was premature for Gretna to file its initial application in early September, it is now doubly premature for Gretna to file an amendment to an untimely application in late September.

Next, Gretna does not have a written agreement with the Association on file with the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, as required by Section 849.086(13)(d)3. The statute expressly states that our Association is the proper entity to enter into the agreement, or in the alternative, the “association representing a majority of the horse owners and trainers at the applicant’s eligible facility.” We raised this point in our letter of September 27. On September 28, Gretna executed an agreement with an entity called the “North Florida Horsemen’s Association.” This organization was incorporated in May 2009 by some of the principals of Gretna Racing, LLC, and it continues to be controlled by them. This fact raises obvious concerns of self-dealing. In any event, the statute establishes a presumption in favor of the Association, and Gretna has provided no supporting documentation whatsoever to the contrary to substantiate that its association and the agreement itself satisfy the statutory requirements.

Gretna has even bigger problems than this. Under Section 849.086(5)(a), the facility and the first race must be completed before the cardroom license can be issued. In its 2008 permit application, Gretna represented to the Department that it would begin construction of a race track “upon issuance of the requested pari-mutuel permit.” Under law, Gretna was required to commence construction within one year. The permit was issued on September 12, 2008. Yet, over three years later and less than two months to go before the first proposed race date, Gretna still has no race track in place. Instead, Gretna is now determined to conduct “barrel racing” indefinitely in lieu of quarter horse racing on a bona fide race track. In doing so, Gretna appears to believe it can acquire a cardroom license while perpetually delaying the start of actual quarter horse racing so long as some form of horse competition is offered on the premises.

However, the statute clearly requires a race track to be in place and quarter horse racing to be conducted prior to the issuance of a cardroom license. Barrel racing does not satisfy this requirement for two reasons. First, running a rodeo event in a field (the covered track that was promised in January 2011 press releases after their ground breaking has reportedly been delayed for various reasons) requires little to no facilities compared to conducting quarter horse races in a race track. Second, barrel racing has none of the attributes of quarter horse racing other than the use of horses. Since colonial times, the hallmark feature of quarter horse racing has been the short and straight sprint of race horses capable of speeds up to 55 miles per hour in short distances. As you may know, the very name “quarter horse” is derived from the distance of these short races, which is traditionally a quarter mile. Barrel racing is a timed racing event conducted in an obstacle course pattern. It is a completely different activity and should be treated accordingly. Along with those facts is the fact that on unbiased barrel horse websites the majority of true barrel horse people and the people that are the backbone of the barrel horse industry do not want barrel racing in Florida to become a pari-mutuel event for all the reasons stated on their websites.

Along those same lines since it appears that the North Florida Horsemen’s Association may not have done their due diligence to find out if the industry they want to change actually wants to be changed, then the association asks that you take the time to do your due diligence and discover for yourself if the people of Gretna actually want a poker room and pari-mutuel barrel racing or do they want what they and the Florida legislature were promised. What they were promised is traditional quarter horse racing and the breeding farms and the thousands of jobs that traditional quarter horse racing can bring to their city and county. Will a poker room and pari-mutuel barrel racing bring those jobs to Gretna and Gadsden County? The association has done the math and cannot figure how pari-mutuel barrel racing with $38,000 in purses over three weekends and 20 performances can even pay the way for the barrel racers to come out anywhere but in the red much less stimulate a breeding industry in the county that will provide thousands of jobs for anyone from the most educated to those with the least education. How many jobs does a poker room provide? How many of those jobs will actually be filled by people from Gretna? What gets forgotten is the fact that traditional horse racing was in this country long before simulcasting, casinos and poker rooms. What gets forgotten is the fact that those types of gaming were add ons to horse racing and not vice versa. What gets forgotten is that horse racing is the basis for one of Florida’s largest industries and that is the agricultural industry of horse breeding. Each horse on a race track provides seven jobs that include CPA’s to stall cleaners to barn builders and the list goes on and on.

I know there is a lot of talk given to “helping Gretna and providing jobs”. I can say as a member of FQHRA that before there was an FQHRA or any discussion of quarter horse racing in Florida that I gave one week of my time in the first part of each summer on a project in Gretna called “Love at Work”. I did this for several years while my two oldest daughters were in middle school and high school. I have actually met the people of Gretna that need the jobs that quarter horse racing will provide. I have repaired their houses and I know where they are coming from. I have sat on their newly repaired front porches and wheel chair ramps and talked with them about their problems. My veterinary practice has at least as many barrel horse clients as it does horse racing clients. I love barrel racing and I love the people and horses associated with the sport. My youngest daughter barrel races on her mustang named Sally. However the cold hard facts are that while barrel racing is a wonderful sport it will not come close to stimulating the jobs and economic development that traditional quarter horse racing will create and barrel racing is not quarter horse racing. A high percentage of barrel racing horses are second career race horses. When I became president of FQHRA in October of 2005 it was not a planned event. FQHRA was formed because there was an extreme interest in reviving quarter horse racing and the breeding industry that comes with it in Florida. AQHA sent out a flier asking for interested parties to show up in Ocala. The point of this is to say the heart and soul of the organization was there in the form of hundreds of quarter horse breeders and racers and the leadership of our association came out of that meeting. FQHRA is in direct contrast to NFHA in that the principals in that organization came first in May 2009 and it appears as though there have been no members besides two of the principals in Gretna Racing until very recently. One reason I took the unpaid job of president of FQHRA is because of the mission of the association to provide economic development in the state of Florida. Our record proves that we not only talk the talk, we walk the walk. Please do not let the people of Gretna be taken advantage of by any organization or business if you can help it. You are bombarded with lots of information. Please take the needed time to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Some questions that need to be answered include:

  • If you decide barrel racing and horse racing are one and the same, will barrel racing then fall under the same regulations as traditional horse racing as in requiring jockey or riders, trainers and owners to be licensed and will the cost of these licenses be the same as for race horses? A license cost in the neighborhood of $120. That equals $360 for the rider/trainer/owner combination. Does that economics work out for the barrel racing competitors for a $38,000 meet spread over 3 weekends. I am not sure who negotiated the deal for the horsemen but at first glance it doesn’t appear to be win/win.
  • Will the horses be drug tested? Who will pay for the testing?
  • Will a compound be formed and have the security to prevent the competing horses from being able to be tampered with by the unlicensed public?
  • How will the past performances be tabulated since Equibase does not keep PP’s on barrel racing? Will it be someone from NFHA or an unbiased organization? Who will pay for and make those stats available to the public? Will the PP’s be based on the rider or jockey since in barrel racing it is the rider who wins or will it be based on the combination of rider and horse or just horse or certain combinations of riders and horses?
  • AQHA registered race horses are required to be parentage verified with DNA testing and then to be tattooed after the horse has been parentage verified? Since the betting public needs the protection of DBPR to make sure the horses presented for the competition are actually the horses stated on the registration papers, will those horses have the same requirements as race horses? Who will handle all this? In other states and specifically in Florida, FQHRA and AQHA work together to make sure all these details are taken care of in a careful manner so that the public has complete confidence in their choice of horse. Since it takes weeks to parentage verify a horse and the start date is supposedly December 1, 2011, has the draw for the “races and post positions or pen number or field position” for the competitors for the first set of performances been drawn so that any horses that are not parentage verified may quickly start that process? How will the differences in these areas of competition (slope of ground and any difference in geometry of the area) be accounted for?
  • Will the riders or jockeys have certain weight restrictions so the unknowing betting public will not have to calculate the difference 5 to 50 pounds may make on a horse’s time?
  • Will there be three stewards, of which two are provided by the state, for each “track” as with traditional horse racing?B. If there are 2 to 4 tracks will there be 6 to 12 stewards?
  • Will there be a state veterinarian there to inspect each horse before it enters the field or area of competition as with horse racing?
  • Will there be an experienced equine veterinarian there with digital x-ray equipment, the capability for endoscopy and the equipment and assistants to handle any emergency that may happen while the horses are competing as with horse racing?
  • Where will any emergencies be sent? Does Gretna Racing have an agreement with a full service hospital that can handle the emergencies 24/7 on weekends?
  • Who will be the horsemen’s book keeper for the meet and who will pay the bookkeeper? At current quarter horse meets in Florida and elsewhere it is customary for the horsemen to provide the book keeper. Is there enough money to pay a book keeper that can count with $38,000 in purses spread over 20 performance much less pay the competitors an amount that they can actually make a profit on?
  • Will the state of Florida get a return on its investment in regulating such a limited amount of equine activity? Twenty performances of horse racing would bring in nearly 800 horses and their trainers, owners, jockeys, groom, veterinarians, farriers and a tremendous number of people on the backside all of whom would have to be licensed to Gretna. I am sure DBPR has calculated the amount of license activity that those 800 horses generate. Those 800 horses averaged over 9 horses per field with 8 races per day in a 24 performance quarter horse meet at a quarter horse track that played by the rules in 2010/2011. In a race horse meet of 20 performances the meet would last 8 weeks and each horse would run an average of two or three times. Race horses cannot race every weekend and so the requirement for horse numbers and therefore their support staff and owners is very high and as a result license activity is also high. Barrel horse competitions have “go rounds” and therefore the same horse may race several times over a “jackpot weekend”. Will the amount of work required by the state of Florida be recovered in license fees with barrel racing? FQHRA is quite sure it is with horse racing. Does the barrel racing industry want to add those fees to the cost of their sport?

With all this in mind and since the comments on unbiased barrel horse websites indicate the backbone of the industry would prefer to remain non pari-mutuel perhaps the barrel racing industry, the state of Florida, Gretna and Gretna Racing, Inc. would be better served with Gretna Racing’s original promoted vision of a traditional quarter horse track with traditional quarter horse racing along with an agricultural center that would make Gretna a destination equestrian community.

With a true destination equestrian facility and the synergistic work of the barrel racing industry, Gretna Racing and FQHRA, Inc as the horsemen’s group as stated in the statutes, perhaps Gretna wins with the jobs that were promised, barrel racing wins with a deal it can actually live and prosper with and the state of Florida wins by putting thousands of people to work while at the same time creating tax revenue that the newly employed will create and Gretna Racing still makes plenty of money.

Since many barrel horses are second career race horses it is a natural fit for FQHRA to represent all the horsemen in a multi-sport equestrian and gaming facility that receives its gaming privileges by utilizing a quarter horse racing permit. If Gretna Racing’s original stated vision of traditional quarter horse racing with an agricultural center is not adhered to is NFHA and its leadership prepared to represent the barrel horse industry’s best interest in Florida’s legislative process?

Does NFHA have a lobbyist and a knowledgeable horsemen representing them who are knowledgeable not only in how to run a barrel pattern and in daily horse care but in how to grow an industry that can replace all the jobs and economic development created by horse racing and its associated industries. Is NFHA represented by lobbyist and lawyers other than those that are principals in Gretna Racing, Inc?

Who will protect NFHA’s interest once horse racing is gone? Will their fate become the fate of the industry they replaced? Could that be the plan? Could the net result of pari-mutuel barrel racing and anything less than a full schedule of live racing be that a few well heeled people reap the benefits of a quarter horse racing permit but a long standing industry is destroyed and Florida’s money goes to Alabama?

The questions could go on and on but the last one the association will ask is since barrel racing would become a regulated industry, will ALL the weekend barrel racing families that do this sport as a family activity come under the new regulations? If not, what will be the details that separate one from another and why would a facility such as Gretna Racing have a “non pari-mutuel barrel racing permit” if it would not be needed at other facilities also?

As you can see there is much more to being a responsible group that represents the horsemen than meets the eye. It requires a group that is well organized on many levels and that has experience in a wide variety of issues that are important to the health and well-being of the horse and the fair treatment of the horsemen.

I apologize for the length of this letter but this is a very important matter for all the reasons stated above and I believe it is worth the time it took me to write it and hopefully for you to read it.

Again, it is critical for the State of Florida to protect the legacy of the horse racing tradition in Florida. We believe authorization of the activity proposed by Gretna would send the wrong signal that Florida endorses short cuts and expediency at the expense of tradition and the rule of law. It would set Florida down the path of dismantling the traditions that built this industry and one of the oldest pastimes in our state. The Department should deny the Gretna applications and insist on full compliance with all applicable requirements by Gretna and every other quarter horse permitholder in Florida.

We appreciate your consideration of these concerns.

Sincerely,
Stephen D. Fisch, DVM
President FQHRA, Inc.
CC: Governor Rick Scott

Carrie O’Rourke, Deputy Chief of Staff
Office of the Governor

Charles M. Trippe Jr., General Counsel
Office of the Governor

National Barrel Horse Association’s Florida Chapter Supports Nearly 40,000 Horsemen In Opposition to Gretna Pari-Mutuel Barrel Racing Scheme

Florida NBHA State Director Linda Jones:  “Florida NHBA does not and will not endorse this endeavor.”

Immediately following the October 12, 2011 announcement of opposition by the National Barrel Horse Association (NBHA) to the “Gretna North Florida Horsemen’s Association” request for State of Florida approval to substitute barrel racing for Quarter Horse racing, Florida NBHA State Director Linda Jones explicitly registered her organization’s denouncement of the scheme in a letter to Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) Secretary Ken Lawson.

Although the Gretna application was returned to its source multiple times as “incomplete,” it is presently under review by the DBPR, which will decide whether to approve the pari-mutuel barrel racing scheme. As if already presuming authorization will be given, Gretna has indicated it will open for business on December 1.

“Florida NHBA does not and will not endorse this endeavor.”
Jones wrote in her letter to Secretary Lawson.

With over 1,400 statewide members, the NBHA’s Florida Division is the largest in the international organization, which has 24,000 members and affiliates in 12 different countries.

Jones further added, “We wholeheartedly lend our support to the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association and the United Horsemen of Florida and seek denial in allowing pari-mutuel wagering on barrel racing in the state of Florida,”

The United Florida Horsemen include the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association (5,000 Florida members); the American Quarter Horse Association (7,163 Florida members); the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association (439 Florida members); the Florida Standardbred Breeders and Owners Association (630 members); and the U.S. Trotting Association (25,000 members).

The “Gretna North Florida Horsemen’s Association” scheme exploits a loophole in Florida law and is rigged with lawsuits designed to usurp statutory Florida horsemen’s performance incentives, as well as challenge a federal statute that protects the horse community with legal rights in issues such as negotiating with track owners on prize (“purse”) money.

“We have provided the people of Florida a place to compete and win money and prizes for years without the benefit of betting,” NBHA Southeastern Director Paul Stanley wrote in his October 12 letter to Secretary Lawson.  “The NBHA promotes a family atmosphere at these events and feels there is no place for betting where there are children competing.”

The NBHA estimates that a majority of its competing members are under 18.

Headquartered in Augusta, Georgia since 1992, the NBHA revolutionized the barrel racing industry by pioneering the divisional format, which allows riders of all skill levels a chance to win money and prizes in barrel racing competition.

To date, its official events have paid out $12,157,330 in prize money to competitors, with over $2.5 million in added money.   In contrast, prize money offered at Gretna, which is neither compliant with State of Florida pari-mutuel regulations, nor sanctioned by the NBHA, is an aggregate $38,000, all of which is underwritten by out-of-state Indian gambling interests.

Initial 2008 Romanik/Dunbar “horsetrack” Florida barrel racing pari-mutuel cardroom attempt was courageously thrown out by the Jefferson County Commission in the face of heavy community and evangelical opposition

In 2008, the Romanik/Dunbar consortium initially tried to secure a Jefferson County “equestrian” venue–presumably for its cardroom pursuits.  The evangelical community there opposed the proposal in droves, even when it became apparent that the County Commission had been “threatened with a lawsuit” if they didn’t heed the Romanik/Dunbar marching orders.  Thanks to the Florida Baptist Witness Church for providing this article.  Read on . . .
 

From the article below:  “Luther Pickle, employed by the Jefferson County Kennel Club told the commissioners he opposed the development because it would be unfair for the greyhound racetrack, which must conduct races over 200 days of the year, to compete with a Quarter horse track which would have to run about six days a year.  More troubling, he said, however, is the talk around town about how the board is being told they need to vote in favor of the track else be threatened with a lawsuit . . . . Tuten told Romanik if he’d asked for a pari-mutuel instead of a horsetrack, he might have supported him, but questioned whether a person who was into horse racing could seriously consider only having six races a year.

“I don’t say that to embarrass anybody here,” Tuten said. “I have friends on both sides of this aisle and I am really disappointed that this item is trying to be hid behind a horseracing facility.”

Jan 22, 2008
JONI B. HANNIGAN, Managing Editor

 

David Hall, a Sunday School teacher at First Baptist Church in Lloyd, stands near the proposed development which is three quarters of a mile from the church and two miles from his home.
Related Coverage
Jefferson County community models ‘informed’ citizenship

MONTICELLO (FBW)—As the hands on the clock swept past twelve over six times in the dignified courtroom of the Monticello Courthouse in Jefferson County, a gold state seal on the wall reminded: “In God We Trust.” It was the day the residents of tiny Lloyd took on high stakes lawyers for big time gaming interests. And won.

County Commissioners voted 4-1 after a Jan. 17 public hearing to deny a permit for the development of a Quarter horse racetrack on a 117-acre plot of land at the intersection of I-10 and State Road 59 (Gamble Road). The $16.4-22 million development proposed a track and a 25,200-square-foot building for a cardroom, lounge, restaurant and 12-lane bowling alley. The site also had four out-parcels for future development.

In courtroom “B” five commissioners sat poker-faced around a table for more than seven hours total—until 1:30 a.m.—while a parade of interested parties and residents packed every seat in the room and took over the mike as their names were called.

L-R: David Romanik, developer; an attorney for Smith family; and Marc Dunbar, pari-mutuel specialist. Photo by Joni B. Hannigan

Eighty-eight signed up and nearly fifty spoke with the remainder yielding their time to others. About 200 stayed until the very end, while the crowd at times swelled to more than 300. A week before, about the same number crowded the chamber for a meeting of the county’s planning commission which turned a 5-4 vote against recommending the proposal to the commission. It still moved forward with a staff recommendation.

Among the “others” yielded time to were George Smith and David Hall—two David’s amongst apparent Goliaths in a fight that sometimes took on almost supernatural proportions. Smith, pastor of First Baptist Church in Lloyd, and Hall, a Sunday School teacher in Smith’s church, are both credited with launching a grassroots effort to stir up the residents of Lloyd in about two weeks time to read, listen and learn about the developer’s effort.

Citing environmental concerns for the property’s wetlands and nearby sinkholes which they say could pollute the region’s water supply, the men also stood clearly against any form of gambling in their community via horsetrack betting or cardroom games.

Despite the property being zoned as a “mixed-use commercial” venue, Hall previously told the Witness a question has been raised about the compatibility of the proposed track and entertainment with community standards.

On the other side of the issue was the principal for the developer Equestrian Land Holdings LLC, David Romanik, himself a prominent South Florida gaming law attorney, and his attorney, a leading gaming and pari-mutuel expert, Marc Dunbar—and consultants who gave favorable opinions on environmental, traffic, building and other concerns.

Ken Smith, who owns 15.3 acres of the proposed development, said he has the right to sell his property. Photo by Joni B. Hannigan

In the middle of their neighbors were the landowners who said they had a right to sell their property to a legitimate business. Among them, Ken Smith, a former Florida State Representative (1960-1969) and part-owner of Jamaro, Inc., which owns 15.53-acres. The other landowner, Rick Baker, operates Triple Creek Nursery.

Smith, in his eighties, first lived in Jefferson County as a young high school teacher and returned to the county about 30 years ago.

Commissioner chairman, Felix “Skeet” Joyner, handled routine commission business and conducted two other hearings on property matters before opening the hearing on the racetrack. Joyner, also a member of First Baptist Church in Lloyd, has been on the county commission for nine years and before that was on the planning commission for eight years.

Quickly pointing to what he said was a deficiency in the application, Joyner recommended it be returned to the planning department for completion. “It is my opinion that this application is not complete,” Joyner said before being outvoted by all the other commissioners.

“I’ve sat on the planning commission for eight years,” Joyner said after telling his colleagues they had just gone against their “own rules and regulations.” Further, the dark-haired and dark-suited man with reading glasses said he’d never seen an application processed so quickly.

“I’m not saying it wasn’t proper procedure. But if it is proper procedure, we have not treated these other applications fairly,” Joyner said.

After Joyner spoke, he invited Marc Dunbar to step up to a podium set up outside the railing facing the commissioners who were at a table inside the railing directly in front of the judge’s bench. The overflow crowd of residents and bystanders filled the jury box to the right of the commissioners, facing the courtroom.

Dunbar said the developers took seriously any environmental concerns presented in regards to area wetlands and had plans in place to work with the Jefferson County planning department to resolve any other issues that might arise.

Dunbar introduced Romanik, calling him the “horseman” who came up with the idea for Jefferson Downs. According to information provided under Florida’s Sunshine laws, Romanik is also a legislative lobbyist for two gaming interests and a racetrack. He told county commissioners he owns horses and for the first 12 years of his life rode them to include his uncle’s horse in Key Biscayne in Miami “when Miami was a nice place to live.”

Speaking fondly of the year he served as president of the Gulfstream Park Racing and Casino in Fort Lauderdale, Romanik said he focused on getting back “to the roots of racing.”

“I think the county fair atmosphere is important in all of this because I think that’s where racing started in America-that’s really what led to the development of the private race tracks,” Romanik said.

Discounting speculation the development was about pari-mutuel wagering (See Jan. 17 article “Proposed horsetrack in Jefferson County draws concern”), Romanik said he was “just interested in the horse part of this business.” He said in Orange County, Calif., the Los Alamitos racetrack has increased the number of races and Quarter horse racing is becoming more popular.

In addition, there would be a creation of about 60 new jobs at $30,000 annually, a grant to the county for infrastructure, an increase in business activity in the interchange, a facility that would benefit the horse community and an increase in entertainment options, Dunbar said.

Pastor Smith strode to the front of the quiet courtroom and noted that like in a Baptist church, there were a lot of opinions being expressed. He quoted from a story in the local newspaper which he said described small town life in glowing terms and posed the question: “Would it be so bad to actually live in Mayberry?” Continuing to read, Smith said, “We’re not just friends, we are family.”

“To me she just described Lloyd to a T. People want to come and live here, but how long will that last?” he asked. “Do you want to take this gamble and see if this pays off?”

Addressing the commissioners, Smith told them he had provided them with spiritual responses in a handout. “We are asking you to listen to your hearts and do the right thing,” he said. “I’m a concerned citizen who cares about my people and my church and my community.”

David Hall, who thanked many members of his Sunday School class for yielding their time, said he wasn’t going to focus on many of the environmental concerns he had already raised in the planning commission meeting the week previous—or the multitude of moral implications or issues of incompatibility—but instead talked about his idea of high standards for the community.

Hall, who lives two miles north of the proposed site on Gamble Road, told commissioners and the developers that if the race track proposal was passed he was certain the residents of Jefferson County would want to insure that their race track would meet the highest standards of any track built.

Reading aloud a list of recent restoration projects completed by private interests, churches and residents in the Lloyd area, Hall also read aloud Marc Dunbar’s long list of accomplishments as a gaming attorney, telling commissioners he believes there is a reason the developer brought in a powerful attorney.

“Are they just building a horsetrack as they are saying, or is there more behind it?” Hall asked rhetorically.

Local resident Mark Mahoney told commissioners to “look at the evangelical people in this community” and think about how pari-mutuel wagering does not meet their standards.

It will be too late to turn back once the permits have been approved and the development has proceeded Mahoney said: “You can’t just roll it off I-10 on wheels. When it’s built, it’s built.”

John Wesley, pastor of a Pentecostal church in the county said he’s not against horses. “I love horses,” Wesley said, but to build “another saloon, cardroom, or watering hole in our community” is doubtful.

Speaking of the new jobs promised for the kids of the community, he said wryly to loud applause: “I guess we need the school board to put into our curriculum bartending and card dealing so our kids will have a future in our county.”

Kari Beck, owner of Ten Oaks Farm which borders the proposed development, raised concerns over noise and damage to the environment. Ten Oaks, a private 220-acre farm, is run by United States Olympian Jill Henneberg.

Beck, who lives in Tallahassee and homeschools her six children, said she chose Jefferson County as a place to develop the farm because of its “pristine environment” while acknowledging the land does border an area zoned for “mixed-use commercial” business.

“Not all mixed-use is created equal,” Beck said.

Ken Smith, speaking as one of the members of the family-owned corporation, Jamaro, Inc., criticized neighbors for what he referred to as their “private playgrounds” and said wealthy people sometimes lose their “sensitivity to the people [they] don’t even know exist” and forget they need jobs. He launched into an oratory about his right as a landowner.

“…[W]hen I buy land I should be granted the same privileges to own that land and to dispose of that land or to do on that land anything I want to so long as it is legal,” Smith said.

Referring to the other opinions presented, Smith said passionately: “This country is not founded on inflammatory rhetoric and emotionalism; it is grounded on the law and when we reach the point when we forget that and we let emotionalism prevail and we let false arguments prevail … we are bordering on, and we are just one step short of anarchy.”

Attorneys representing Jamaro and the Beck family each gave the commissioners a different version of the interpretation of compatibility in the county’s land use code.

Luther Pickle, employed by the Jefferson County Kennel Club told the commissioners he opposed the development because it would be unfair for the greyhound racetrack, which must conduct races over 200 days of the year, to compete with a Quarter horse track which would have to run about six days a year.

More troubling, he said, however, is the talk around town about how the board is being told they need to vote in favor of the track else be threatened with a lawsuit.

“First of all, that’s the equivalent of political extortion as far as I’m concerned,” Pickle said. “The threat of a lawsuit has nothing to do with what you’re bound to do here. That’s the result of what you do.”

J. Lois Rodriguez, a Lloyd resident who bought the former historic Hale Place seven years ago and restored it, said he now breeds black angus cows there. He told the commissioners there’s apparently a “lot of misinformation” floating around. He said he wondered about how the proposal “came out of nowhere about a month ago,” and said the staff must have known about it for 5-6 months.

“Why all the secrecy?” he asked. “Why all this moving and fast tracking?”

Addressing remarks made by Ken Smith, Rodriguez, called him a “politician” and told him to not take personally the assessment of his property as a swamp. To which Smith quipped: “statesman” to replace “politician.”

“You’re a statesman and I’ve got 7,000 acres of citrus in Cuba that I want to sell you, too,” Rodriguez shot back laughing, while the crowd roared with laughter.

Rodriguez, who told commissioners he has served on 44 boards for various groups and corporations, said he was never told how to vote.

“So don’t worry about the lawsuits because he’s going to sue you if you vote against it and I’m going to sue you if you vote for it,” he laughed, gesturing towards Dunbar.

Lisa Alden, a resident who lives two miles north of I-10 on Gamble Road said she didn’t have any knowledge of the proposed development until her neighbor, David Hall, brought it to her attention.

A horse owner and self-described “red-neck,” Alden said she wasn’t convinced at first there was anything wrong with the proposal, but began to doubt the claims of developers that they were considering horses’ needs when she didn’t see the usual facilities in the plan.

“We love quarter horses,” Alden said. “We don’t love gambling. So, I guess if you approve it, I could get a face-lift and get a job as a stripper, because I guess that’s what’s coming next,” she said satirically to loud applause. “Bring me a Publix, bring me Cracker Barrel, but don’t bring me [strippers and a casino].”

After the hands of the clock finally swept past midnight and the residents, property owners, attorneys and other interested parties had their say, the commissioners began to question the developer, his attorney, county staff members and other experts present.

“I’ve always supported property rights,” Commissioner Tuten said, smoothing light hair ordinarily hidden beneath the cowboy hat sitting on the bench behind him.

Tuten told Romanik if he’d asked for a pari-mutuel instead of a horsetrack, he might have supported him, but questioned whether a person who was into horse racing could seriously consider only having six races a year.

“I don’t say that to embarrass anybody here,” Tuten said. “I have friends on both sides of this aisle and I am really disappointed that this item is trying to be hid behind a horseracing facility.

“Unfortunately, of what I consider personal reasons and morally, a fabrication, … I cannot support your request,” Tuten said. “Now I want to apologize to the Smith family because I cannot support their position and the sale of the property. I wish to God I could tonight and I apologize for being placed in the position I’ve been placed in. But six races a year does not constitute a horse race facility. I apologize, but I do not like what I consider being scammed.”

Commissioner Danny Monroe asked Romanik if he had any commitment from horse owners to bring horses to the race track. Romanik said he did not.

Commissioner Jerry Sutphin went down a detailed list he kept of speakers by number and name, critiquing their remarks and laughing outright at some.

Commissioner Gene Hall questioned Romanik about funds the facility might give to the public schools for education. Romanik promised only that there would be certain “charity funds” available as mandated by law—but he couldn’t make any promises.

Joyner concluded his remarks by calling the proposed development site an “absolute swamp.” Talking about the runoff from the facility getting into the wetlands and into nearby sinkholes, he cited overall concerns for the environment, and again, the lack of a completed application as reasons for denying the permit.

Finally, Joyner said: “I’ve been told by the attorneys that I couldn’t speak on gambling but I am going to anyhow.” Relating a story about how he placed a lottery machine in one of his businesses years ago, he said two longtime employees began to steal from him and he had to fire them.

“I never will have another one of them,” Joyner said of the lottery machines. “I do not want gambling in my community to destroy my community, so I’m going to vote against it.”

Urging the other commissioners to vote their own conscience and to do the “best thing for Jefferson County,” Joyner yielded the floor to a staff member who read the commissioners a list of their responsibilities in regards to voting.

Just before 1:30 a.m., Jan. 18, the Jefferson County Commission voted 4-1 to deny moving forward the application process for the development proposing a Quarter horsetrack. Afterwards, Romanik told the Tallahassee Democrat he didn’t know whether his company would appeal the decision.

“I really have to think about it and assess what happened,” he said.

FHBPA–Florida Must Stop North Florida Horsemen’s Association Gretna Job-Killing “Pari-Mutuel Barrel Gateway”

Even though Florida Quarter Horse racing fell by the free market wayside 30 years ago, but is now making a comeback at formerly defunct Hialeah Park, a small group of insider lobbyists armed with a “shell game” Quarter Horse pari-mutuel permit and seeking to cash in on legal loopholes have joined forces to ask the State to essentially privatize cardroom operation under the premise of pari-mutuel activity by conducting two days of unconstitutional, untaxed barrel racing that, even from the outset, runs afoul of sanctioned pari-mutuel regulation.

As Florida struggles to grow its best and most lucrative industries, create jobs and foster businesses, it must render extreme caution to the collateral damage that would be rendered by ill-advised proposals such as untaxed, unregulated and unconstitutional pari-mutuel barrel racing that is now before the State Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.

As Florida’s economy sputters amid the conundrum of determining just how much regulation kills jobs, versus how much is needed to protect struggling small businesses and consumers, while simultaneously containing the proliferation of economic drains such as unregulated tribal gaming, an insidious new proposal has reared its head in northern Florida that, if allowed, would open the floodgates for unregulated betting on anything and everything, without concern for the 51,700 jobs and corresponding small businesses that are the cornerstone for one of Florida’s largest economic drivers—the Horse Racing Industry.

Even though Florida Quarter Horse racing fell by the free market wayside 30 years ago, but is now making a comeback at formerly defunct Hialeah Park, a small group of insider lobbyists armed with a “shell game” Quarter Horse pari-mutuel permit and seeking to cash in on legal loopholes have joined forces to ask the State to essentially privatize cardroom operation under the premise of pari-mutuel activity by conducting two days of unconstitutional, untaxed barrel racing that, even from the outset, runs afoul of sanctioned pari-mutuel regulation.

Professionally acknowledged as a horse show and hobby event typically dominated by teenage girls, barrel racing is a lock and stock of rodeos, all of which are self-regulating private operations that travel the country and determine their own prize money, operating standards and competitors.   Not only is barrel racing not recognized as an acceptable pari-mutuel competition by Florida law, but nowhere in the United States are barrel racing performances being regularly staged by constitutionally sanctioned pari-mutuel facilities.

Professional gamblers will define a “degenerate” as someone that feels compelled to bet on anything—such as how fast two drops of water will tumble down the side of a wall.  Tantamount to trying a “gateway” drug for the first time, if Florida succumbs to the degenerate mentality of allowing gambling on anything and everything, not only will we be on the way to decimating our social fabric through the expansion of gambling in the process, but, simply to accommodate a distorted scheme that will benefit only the connected few, our regulators will inadvertently dismantle the thousands of small businesses that make up the entire Florida Horse Racing Industry, a $2.2 billion annual economic engine that has long been carefully nurtured and developed to its current status as third in the nation.

Under the guise of a free market, this insider “barrel gateway” proposal may unwittingly cause Florida’s taxpayers to be liable for even more big government by creating the need for additional regulatory oversight, licensing, drug testing and policing.

After rejecting expanded gambling for decades, Florida voters thought carefully when they approved the addition of slot machines at constitutionally sanctioned pari-mutuel facilities at which the requisite regulatory checks and balances are already in place.  If the “barrel gateway” to free market gambling is opened in Florida, gone will be everything from the rolling pastures of Ocala, to the mom and pop horse training operations, to the feed stores, to the blacksmiths and the thousands of unseen racetrack backstretch employees who tend to the horses and contribute their blood, sweat and tears to putting on the daily show that feeds the growing national on-line pari-mutuel simulcasting machine.  Indeed, the starkly visible downslide of Florida’s thoroughbred racing industry has directly coincided with the rise of tribal gaming and the proliferation of Internet wagering.

As Florida struggles to grow its best and most lucrative industries, create jobs and foster businesses, it must render extreme caution to the collateral damage that would be rendered by ill-advised proposals such as untaxed, unregulated and unconstitutional pari-mutuel barrel racing that is now before the State Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.

Horse Racing Industry Abuzz With Disbelief Over Audacity of Job-Killing Florida Pari-Mutuel Barrel Scheme–Horsemen, Your Calls, Emails, Letters to Florida Regulators Needed NOW

URGENT CALL TO THE POST for Florida Horsemen!  Your calls, letters and emails to Department of Business and Professional Regulation Secretary Ken Lawson are needed BEFORE OCTOBER 25 to let him know you OPPOSE parimutuel barrel racing in Florida.  Please e-mail him at: Ken.Lawson@dbpr.state.fl.us  TODAY!

 The Blood Horse and The Paulick Report, both major Thoroughbred Horse Racing publications and blogs, are abuzz with contention about the “true motives” for Florida’s “farcical” consideration of an outrageous scheme to define “barrel racing,” (a rodeo event) as “horse racing.” 

“We are very alarmed at what appears to be an attempted end run around the Florida statutes to get a card room by a number of Florida lobbyists,” Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent & Protective Association executive director Kent Stirling wrote to Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Secretary Ken Lawson.  “If (the license is granted), we feel it would open the door to other pari-mutuel licensees that currently operate live horse racing to do the same with their quarter horse licenses.”

Read both stories below (click on the headlines to access the blog comments):

Published October 6, 2011 in The Paulick Report, an International Thoroughbred Online News Magazine
Florida barrel racing application sparks controversy
by Ray Paulick | 10.06.2011
www.paulickreport.com

An application for a Quarter horse racing permit and card room license, submitted by a group that includes the Florida lobbyist for Frank Stronach’s Gulfstream Park, has raised serious concerns among both Quarter horse and Thoroughbred horsemen in the Sunshine State about its true motives.

The application for Gretna Racing LLC calls for two days of pari-mutuel wagering on the rodeo activity barrel racing at a site in the small town of Gretna, near the Florida-Georgia border just north of the state capital of Tallahassee. Gretna, with a population of just 1,700, is 88% African American and has a poverty rate of 37%, according to census figures.

If the license application is approved, it would be the first time barrel racing is considered a pari-mutuel activity anywhere in North America.

The application was submitted on Sept. 6 by PCI Gaming Authority, a division of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, which is listed as 70% owner of Gretna Racing; lobbyist Marc Dunbar, who counts Gulfstream Park among his clients; lobbyist Wallace McGee; and David Romanik, a former Gulfstream Park president under Stronach. Dunbar, McGee and Romanik own 10% each of Gretna Racing.

Executives with both the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association and the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association fear there could be something more sinister to the application than merely allowing locals to bet on a rodeo event – a precedent that would give Quarter horse permit holders the option to abandon live racing. Currently, Quarter horse permit holders are required to conduct a minimum of 20 days of live Quarter horse racing to maintain both a racing and card room permit.

Quarter horse permit holders include Gulfstream Park, Pompano Park, Tampa Bay Downs, Hialeah Park, and the Florida Thoroughbred Breeders and Owners Association.

“We are very alarmed at what appears to be an attempted end run around the Florida statutes to get a card room by a number of Florida lobbyists,” FHBPA executive director Kent Stirling wrote to the director of the Florida Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering. “If (the license is granted), we feel it would open the door to other pari-mutuel licensees that currently operate live horse racing to do the same with their quarter horse licenses.”

Stephen D. Fisch, DVM, president of the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association, described the application to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation as “farcical” and said if approved would make a “mockery” of the application process and statutory requirements of a card room and Quarter horse racing licensing.

“Moreover, if licenses are granted by the department,” Fisch wrote, “it would invite similar affronts on the other types of horse racing – Thoroughbred racing and harness racing, by setting the misguided precedent that horse racing includes any competitive activity involving a horse. The ultimate result would be the inevitable diminution of the entire horse racing industry and the wholesale expansion of gambling. The growing number of Quarter horse permits issued in the state, most of them dormant, would suddenly be allowed to offer rodeo events as a pari-mutuel wagering activity in lieu of legitimate horse racing.”

Proponents of the license have enlisted the help of 11-time world champion barrel racer Charmayne James and the newly formed North Florida Horseman’s Association.

A call to the Tallahassee office of lobbyist Dunbar was not returned.

Published on October 6, 2011 in The Blood Horse, an International Thoroughbred Racing Magazine
Florida Horsemen Say Permit Threatens Racing

By
Updated: Thursday, October 6, 2011 5:55 PM
www.bloodhorse.com

A Florida Quarter Horse permitholder’s request to use its license to conduct pari-mutuel barrel racing events has generated concern and attracted criticism from state Thoroughbred racing leaders.

Gretna Racing LLC has asked the Florida Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering for permission to use its license for barrel racing beginning Dec. 1, 2011. Gretna is a town of about 1,750 people located in the Florida panhandle, northwest of Tallahassee.

Barrel racing is a rodeo-like event in which a horse and rider are timed racing in a cloverleaf pattern around three barrels. Pari-mutuel wagering commonly isn’t offered on the sport. If the Gretna company is allowed to use its license in this way, the facility would also be allowed to open a poker room.

A spokeswoman for the Florida DPMW said Oct. 4 “this is a unique issue, and a determination has not been made” on whether barrel racing is permissible under a Quarter Horse permit in Florida.

The Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association and the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association have asked the Florida DPMW to not approve the application for barrel racing by Gretna Racing based on their views that Florida laws on Quarter Horse racing limit that sport to conventional Quarter Horse races. Barrel racing is held as a non pari-mutuel event at numerous sites in northwestern Florida and other parts of the state.

Wesley Cox, a board member of the North Florida Horsemen’s Association, said he expects that at least 80% of the horses would be Quarter Horses in barrel races at Gretna. Cox’s organization has a purse agreement under which its members would provide horses to Gretna Racing; he said he expects that some retired Thoroughbreds could be in barrel races at Gretna.

In a Sept. 18 letter to the Florida DPMW, Florida HBPA executive director Kent Stirling said his organization is concerned that granting Gretna Racing’s request “would open the door to other pari-mutuel licensees that currently operate live horse racing to do the same with their Quarter Horse licenses. We remind you that Gulfstream Park, Pompano Park, Tampa Bay Downs, Hialeah Park, and the Florida Thoroughbred Breeders’ and Owners’ Association all have Quarter Horse licenses.”

Stirling told The Blood-Horse the Florida HBPA is hoping to prevent any future efforts by tracks to substitute low-cost barrel racing for conventional race meets while keeping poker rooms and, in Miami-Dade and Broward counties, casinos.

Gretna Racing’s amended application, filed Sept. 30, raises the issue of what activities are permissible under a Quarter Horse permit or any other pari-mutuel permit in Florida. Any Florida pari-mutuel permit-holder that conducts at least the minimum number of required performances a year can have a poker room that can be open 365 days a year.

Poker is the main source of revenue growth at many non-horse pari-mutuel facilities in Florida. In its application, Gretna Racing said it plans to have a poker room.

The application lists the Poarch Creek Tribe, based in Atmore, Ala., as 70% owner of Gretna Racing. The American Indian tribe owns most of the land at the facility in Gretna, which is about 25 miles west of Tallahassee. It is land the Poarch Creeks purchased, and is thus not tribal land on which they could build a casino under federal laws.

The application lists David Romanik, a former Gulfstream Park president, and Marc Dunbar, a partner in the Pennington Law Firm in Tallahassee, as each owning 10% of Gretna Racing. Dunbar also is a lobbyist for Gulfstream Park and for several gaming equipment companies. Gulfstream is not affiliated with Gretna Racing.

Dunbar said Gretna Racing has a policy of not commenting on pending regulatory applications.

Gretna Racing plans to hold 40 barrel racing cards between Dec. 1, 2011, and Jan. 15, 2012. An important question is whether the Florida DPMW will have time to approve or deny Gretna Racing’s application before Dec. 1.

The Florida DPMW has 30 days, starting Sept. 30, to review the application and determine if it is complete. If it deems an application complete, it has up to 90 days to approve or deny it.

A central issue is an interpretation of definitions of horse racing and Quarter Horse racing in Florida pari-mutuel laws to determine if Gretna Racing’s intended use of Quarter Horses makes barrel racing an eligible event. Those laws require a Quarter Horse meet to have at least half its races as Quarter Horse races. Other races in mixed meets under a Quarter Horse permit can include Thoroughbreds and other designated breeds.

Dr. Steven Fisch, a veterinarian who is president of the Florida QHRA, said Gretna’s planned barrel racing meet “is an attempt to skirt the rules and have poker.”

Cox said the North Florida Horsemen’s Association, which was formed last year, reached agreement with Gretna Racing “because we also will provide horses for the non pari-mutuel events they plan to hold the rest of the year.”

“They want to make it a year-round equestrian center,” said Cox, who breeds and owns horses at a ranch in Quincy, Fla.

Hialeah Park is the only Florida track that holds Quarter Horse meets. It will hold its third meet from Dec. 10, 2011, through Feb. 16, 2012.

For the third consecutive meet, Hialeah has a purse agreement with the Florida QHRA. Also for the third straight meet, Hialeah does not plan to hold any Thoroughbred races under its Quarter Horse permit.

Hialeah is holding Quarter Horse meets primarily because a 2010 Florida law makes it eligible to have a casino with Las Vegas-style slot machines if it holds those meets. A state appeals court is considering a lawsuit by three other Miami-area pari-mutuels that challenges Hialeah’s legal right to have a casino.